Su-27 Pilot remembers Mock Dogfight He Had against NATO F-16s that were trying to Violate Russian Airspace - Aviation Wings Su-27 Pilot remembers Mock Dogfight He Had against NATO F-16s that were trying to Violate Russian Airspace - Aviation Wings

Su-27 Pilot remembers Mock Dogfight He Had against NATO F-16s that were trying to Violate Russian Airspace

Su 27 F 16

‘I was all alone out over international waters and a good long way from the shore when a pair of F-16s popped up and, in a manner of speaking, asked me to step outside…’ Maj. Yevgeniy Oleynik, Russian Su-27 Pilot.

Development of what was to become the world-renowned Su-27 began in the 1960s by the Soviet Union in response to the threat posed by the new fourth generation of American fighters with exceptional range, heavy armament, and great agility, but the task was long and arduous with the now-familiar Flanker production version not flying until 1981 and production not beginning until 1982.

As we have previously explained western aircraft usually probed Soviet air defenses during the Cold War. Those aircraft were often intercepted by Su-27s.

Noteworthy such actions continued unabated in post-Soviet days in the northern regions of Russia. As told by Yefim Gordon and Dmitriy Komissarov in their book Sukhoi Su-27 & 30/33/34/35, for example, in just three months of 1997 alone, the Russian PVO’s 10th Air Army radar units detected and tracked the movements of 20 ‘ferret’ aircraft and 141 foreign combat aircraft. P-3s, Boeing RC-135 ELINT platforms, and other Western military aircraft ‘logged’ a total of more than 72 hours in the 10th OA PVO’s area of responsibility. On four occasions, Su-27Ps from the 941st IAP commanded by Sniper Pilot (a grade reflecting expertise) Col. Nikolay Ovechkin scrambled to ward off potential intruders.

Maj. Yevgeniy Oleynik, deputy squadron commander of the 941st IAP’s Sqn 1, recalls flying top cover for Russian marine forces holding live-fire practice in 1996.

‘I was all alone out over international waters and a good long way from the shore when a pair of F-16s popped up and, in a manner of speaking, asked me to step outside. They came within 50 m [164 ft]; I could see the pilots’ faces covered by oxygen masks. We were all armed with missiles. We followed parallel courses for a while, then started showing each other what our aircraft can do: wingovers, yo-yos, and so on. It was a sort of mock combat. However, the tussle was brief, as at 10,000 m [32,810 ft] the Su-27 has an advantage over the F-16. Pretty soon the “guests” departed and I was all alone again. It felt good to know that they gave up and didn’t scare me off. Still, it’s quite possible they were merely getting low on fuel.’

However, despite the fact that the 941stnIAP’s pilots repeatedly succeeded in preventing intrusions in the northwest ofnRussia, their flying skills deteriorated somewhat as time passed. By the autumnnof 1997, 15 of the unit’s officers had no class rating at all or Pilot 3rdnClass rating – right back to 1990. The reason for their failure to upgrade tonhigher ratings was the persistent fuel shortages making proficiency trainingnall but impossible. In the first quarter of 1997, the 941st IAP accumulated justn1,500 flying hours instead of the planned 3,000 hours for this reason.

Sukhoi Su-27 & 30/33/34/35 is published by Crecy and is available to order here.

Photo by U.S. Air Force

Related posts

A rough ride: Hurricane Hunters fly Milton, collect data for NHC forecasts

Jockey-14, the AC-130H that ditched into the Indian Ocean after suffering a detonation of its 105mm cannon

USMC Harrier II pilot tells why in a vertical landing keeping the AV-8B nose pointed into relative wind is a matter of life or death