Tag:

military

RF 4C SAM 1 1170x585 1

RF-4C cockpit recording captures when its wingman is shot down by North Vietnamese SA-2

by Till Daisd September 13, 2024

written by Till Daisd

RF-4C Phantom tail #69-0355 went down during “Vietnam Ceasefire” ops while serving with the 14th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron of the 432nd TFW based at Udorn RTFAFB, Thailand.

The following video is a recording from the cockpit of an RF-4C Phantom (callsign Dodge 1, not Fox, as the subtitles say) during the Vietnam War recon flight. An SA-2 Guideline missile shoots down Wingman (Dodge 2). Capt. Roger Ernest Behnfeldt was Dodge 2A (Pilot) and Captain Tamotsu Shingaki was Dodge 2B (WSO). RF-4C Phantom tail #69-0355 went down approximately 8 mi.

NE of Bac Giang NVN during “Vietnam Ceasefire” ops while serving with the 14th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron of the 432nd TFW based at Udorn RTFAFB, Thailand. Captain Shingaki was captured by the NVA but was released on Mar. 29, 1973. Capt. Behnfeldt was declared MIA for 15 years until his remains were recovered in 1987.

The USAF realized early in the 1960s that it needed additional tactical reconnaissance aircraft to support the RF-101s that were currently in service. The USAF chose a modification of the F-4C fighter. The first production aircraft took to the skies on May 18, 1964, marking the beginning of the RF-4C development program in 1962. Officially, 499 RF-4Cs were approved by the Air Force.

The RF-4C can carry a variety of cameras in three different stations in its nose section. It could capture pictures day or night, at both high and low altitudes. The RF-4C did not carry any offensive armament, although, some were equipped with four AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles for defense during the last few years of their service

The 16th Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron became the first operational unit to fly the RF-4C. In October 1965, that unit deployed to Southeast Asia to provide photographic reconnaissance of the growing conflict in South Vietnam. In the following years, RF-4Cs flew reconnaissance missions around the world, including Desert Shield/Desert Storm in Iraq in 1990-1991. The Air Force retired all of its RF-4Cs by 1995.

Photo by U.S. Air Force

September 13, 2024 0 comment

Loring AFB Crew

The 1969 Loring Air Force Base B-52 crash

by Till Daisd September 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

“The B-52 had crashed shortly after takeoff, killing everyone on board and, because it was fully loaded with hundreds of thousands of pounds of fuel, creating a massive conflagration off the end of the runway,” Jay Lacklen former B-52 pilot

Jay Lacklen is a former B-52 pilot with 12,500 flying hours and the author of two books, Flying the Line: An Air Force Pilot’s Journey and Flying the Line: An Air Force Pilot’s Journey Volume Two: Military Airlift Command. He’s working on the last book of the trilogy.

1969 B-52 crash

“Three years before my arrival, on an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) to test the base operational mission capability, Loring had suffered a horrendous disaster. A B-52 had crashed shortly after takeoff, killing everyone on board and, because it was fully loaded with hundreds of thousands of pounds of fuel, creating a massive conflagration off the end of the runway. The fireball reportedly lit up the cockpit of an airborne Loring tanker twenty miles away. In the insular, close-knit base community, this presented a devastating loss. Over the five years, I flew out of Loring, I would see the remnants of the crash site and be reminded of how quickly I could die in this business.”

Clyde Sikorsky, then Sergeant in the Fire Dept. at Loring Air Force Base, recalled:

“On 4 September 1969, during an ORI, Inwitnessed the crash of B-52G 58-0215 at Loring AFB as a Sergeant in the FirenDept working at the Crash Station.

The sad story of the 1969 Loring Air Force Base B-52 Crash

“As MITOs progressed, my partner and I stood by in our P-6 pick up about 50 yards in front of the alert bombers. 58-0215 was having difficulties with one or more inboard engines on the port wing, so we were radioed to continue to stand by on that aircraft until it taxied to the south end of the runway. We were then to hustle down to the north end and standby there as they took off. After several failed attempts to start and run up the engine, they finally got it going, or so it appeared. During this time I could see the Aircraft Commander and, I assume, the Wing Commander talking and gesturing to each other. Finally, I saw the Wing Commander wave them on…to proceed to the south end of the runway and go.

“At the north end, we observed the aircraft approach on its take-off run. As the plane neared us, it lifted off much farther down the runway than normal. As it passed us, the plane struggled to gain altitude. I believe it never gained more than a few hundred feet of altitude. I did not hear any unusual engine noises, just the usual roar. Finally, we observed it slowly disappear beyond the tree line, and after a few silent seconds, we heard the inevitable. It was the beginning of a long night.

“I was never privy to any official information concerning the accident, but it appeared several ejections were attempted. I do not know the source of the engine(s) problem, or why they were ordered to go, except that it was an ORI.
One personal thought: I was deeply moved by the loss of those men, and that I was unable to help. That was my job.

Clyde Sikorski
USAF 1966-1974”

Here’s the list of Crew Members involved in the crash:
Pilot/Commander: Maj Nils O A Oxehufwud USAF killed.
Co-pilot: Capt William N Payne USAF killed.
Nav: Capt Theodore A Burbank USAF killed.
EWO: Maj Robert M Murray USAF killed.
Rad/Nav: Lt Col Robert C Smith USAF killed.

AG: M/Sgt Earl J Barnes USAF killed.
Obs: Col Homer C Bell Jr USAF killed.

Although they both ejected, the Nav and R/N’s chutes did not fully open. Approximately two or three miles north of the runway was the crash site. In 1980, the treetops had been completely sheared off, and there was a large clearing with a lot of debris; nonetheless, there were a few mounds where the bulldozers had plowed some large pieces.

The Aviation Safety Network states that a complete loss of electrical power or a malfunctioning water injection system could have been the cause of the accident, leaving the aircraft without sufficient thrust to make it airborne.

Photo by U.S. Air Force

September 11, 2024 0 comment

C-5 pilot stuck in a holding pattern over Frankfurt

by Till Daisd August 20, 2024

written by Till Daisd

“Fascinated, I watched this process that produced an airborne spiral staircase of circling and descending planes below me. Soon, however, disputes arose. Most of the aircraft had flown from all parts of the world to land in Germany and some did not have much fuel left…” Jay Lacklen, former C-5 pilot

Jay Lacklen is an ex-C-5 pilot with 12,500 flying hours and the author of two books, Flying the Line: An Air Force Pilot’s Journey and Flying the Line: An Air Force Pilot’s Journey Volume Two: Military Airlift Command. The following story comes from the last book of the trilogy: “Flying the Line, an Air Force Pilot’s Journey,” book three, “Air Mobility Command, 1993-2004,” in progress.”

Rudesheim Spiral Staircase

The one and only time I flew the short repositioning hop from Ramstein, Germany, to Frankfurt, I got a rude surprise. I thought it might be a simple tower-to-tower transaction and take about twenty minutes. Instead, I suffered one of the most intense air traffic control encounters of my career.

Two features complicated matters; it was 10 AM in Germany and, therefore, prime time for Frankfurt arrivals and departures. Also, the weather was bad with bands of rain clouds rolling over the field. As Ramstein’s departure handed me over to “Fritz” (my nickname for all Frankfurt controllers), the pace became frantic. Fritz tersely issued his directions to the flood of planes arriving while his tower counterparts tried to launch dozens of planes at this prime departure time.

“Reach, proceed to Rudesheim, and hold at Flight Level 8.0,” he ordered me. He was curt and direct as he ordered dozens of aircraft into the elaborate alignment designed to handle an airborne rush hour. I found myself on the top of a stack of large aircraft in the Rudesheim holding pattern. These elongated oval patterns aligned atop each other provided one-minute legs outbound and inbound to the RUD navigation beacon.

The rain shower cells became less numerous, and, as I circled the pattern, I began to see the aircraft alignment Fritz had choreographed. Looking down from my perch atop the stack, I saw many large planes, most B-747s, circling below me in different positions in their holding patterns at thousand-foot increments. This alignment allowed the lowest aircraft, at 3,000, to gain clearance for an approach to the field. As that plane left its orbit, Fritz would clear the plane at 4,000 to descend to 3,000. He would work us all down 1,000 feet once the previous plane had called level at its new altitude.

Fascinated, I watched this process, that produced an airborne spiral staircase of circling and descending planes below me. Soon, however, disputes arose. Most of the aircraft had flown from all parts of the world to land in Germany and some did not have much fuel left. These pilots began demanding priority. Fritz started polling each of the cockpits for how much fuel they had. Once, in another situation, Fritz asked a MAC airplane for his situation by saying, “Say your fuel, MAC, and do not lie!” (Screw you, Fritz!)

I was “fat” on fuel, as we say, because I had just taken off from Ramstein and could have orbited for an hour or so. Fritz broke two or three planes out of the holding pattern for vectors to final ahead of the rest of us for their low fuel status.

USAF receives final C-5M Super Galaxy

Eventually, Fritz brought us into the field from the “staircase,” all was well, and a frothy German beer awaited. For once I was fresh and rested and could head for the Basler Eck restaurant in Frankfurt or spend an evening in the university section downtown to have a scrumptious Indian curry.

Photo by U.S. Air Force

August 20, 2024 0 comment

The SR-71 crew training in anti-SAM tactics left a 5-mile-long contrail after dumping fuel to test if the afterburner would ignite the fuel trail

by Till Daisd August 12, 2024

written by Till Daisd

The Blackbird

The Lockheed A-12 and YF-12A aircraft served as the basis for developing the SR-71, also referred to as the “Blackbird” a long-range, advanced strategic reconnaissance aircraft. The 4200th (later 9th) Strategic Reconnaissance Wing at Beale Air Force Base, California, received the first SR-71 to begin service in January 1966. The first SR-71 flight occurred on December 22, 1964. On January 26, 1990, the U.S. Air Force retired its SR-71 fleet.

During its operational lifetime, the SR-71 provided intelligence about the Yom Kippur War in 1973, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, the US raid on Libya in 1986, and the revelation of Iranian Silkworm missile batteries in 1987. The USAF ceased SR-71 operations in January 1990.

For almost 24 years, the SR-71 held the record for being the fastest and highest-flying operational aircraft in the world. It could survey 100,000 square miles of the Earth’s surface per hour from 80,000 feet.

SR-71 crews’ anti-SAM tactics

In 1968, the SR-71 crewmembers spent most of their time in the crew lounge, discussing anti-SAM tactics. As told by Paul Crickmore in his book SR-71 Blackbird (Combat Legends), the 9th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing approached the time when they would be flying out of the country at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa.

The plan was to penetrate enemy airspace at Mach 3. If fired upon, the pilot would accelerate to Mach 3.2 and climb, thereby forcing the missile’s guiding system to re-calculate the intercept solution. One idea was to dump fuel to become lighter, increasing the climb rate.

A 5-mile-long contrail in the stratosphere

During a sortie over Montana, a crew decided to end the debate by dumping fuel for ten seconds and seeing if the afterburner would ignite the fuel trail. Instead, this turned instantly into an ice cloud in the fridge’s -55°C stratosphere and left a 5-mile-long contrail finger pointing directly at the aircraft.

Once he turned back toward the west, the pilot stated that he could see the trail for hundreds of miles. That plan was scratched. That was the opposite effect, but they wanted it regardless; the SR-71 was the first attempt at stealth in an airplane.

Check out Habubrats‘s Facebook page for further Blackbird photos and stories.

Photo by unknown

August 12, 2024 0 comment

Ranger 12 1170x780 1

The sad story of EA-3B Ranger 12 crash on USS Nimitz

by Till Daisd August 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

The deaths of seven crew members in the crash of an EA-3B during a night recovery onboard USS Nimitz (CVN-68) in the Mediterranean rapidly solidified the effort to get the `Whale’ off the boat.

The sad video in this post features the terrible VQ-2 EA-3B accident that took place on Jan. 25, 1987, aboard the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) aircraft carrier.

At that time, the end of the A-3 in US Navy service was only four years away. Since the end of the Vietnam War, a series of incidents have left the Naval Aviation community more concerned about the safety of the aircraft. The most concerning aspect was the loss of forty-three personnel at this time, even though the 10 jets involved were a considerable number. Seven crew members lost their lives in an EA-3B crash that occurred during a nighttime recovery aboard the USS Nimitz in the Mediterranean, which quickly solidified the effort to get the “Whale” off the boat.

In his book A-3 Skywarrior Units of the Vietnam War, Rick Morgan explains that on the evening of January 25, 1987, “Ranger 12” (BuNo 144850) was launched with a full crew of seven people on a surveillance mission. The “Whale” was directed to the duty A-7 tanker for additional fuel after multiple failed attempts near the rear of the ship. The package of the Corsair II turned out to be “sour,” or useless. Faced with the prospect of having the crew bail out into the winter waters at night, the ship decided to rig the barricade. The final pass was like all of the others — high in and the pilot did not quickly cut (shut off) the engines as required over the ramp.

The A-3 floated over the wires and collided with the nose gear of the barricade, which was also improperly built because it was missing a vital piece of gear needed to tighten the upper strap. As expected, the aircraft passed over the angle and through the barricade before hitting the water. The rescue chopper passed swiftly overhead and saw no movement inside the aircraft, which was momentarily floating on the water’s surface. A few minutes later, the EA-3B sank, taking all seven soldiers with it.

The list of the seven men who gave their lives:

LT Stephen H. Batchelder (Intelligence Evaluator)
LCDR Ronald R. Callander (Navigator)
AT2 Richard A. Herzing
LT Alan A. Levine (Pilot)
CTI3 Patrick R. Price*
LT James D. Richards (Junior Evaluator)
CTI3 Craig H. Rudolf

The crash of VQ-1 EA-3B BuNo 144854 during carrier landing practice at NAS Miramar, California, occurred the night after this one on June 26. The three people on board died. Orders were issued to cease A-3 carrier deployments after both accidents and another occurrence involving a trapped VQ-2 jet due to a failed nose gear were taken into consideration. By the end of 1987, VQ-1 and VQ-2 had both retired their aircraft from carrier duty, though they kept them available for use from the beach. But for two more years, the FRS in VAQ-33 kept qualifying carrier instructors for proficiency-related reasons. August 1989 saw the last “Whale” trap and cat off the coast of the Atlantic.

The last A-3 crash happened on January 13, 1988, when VAK-208 KA-3B BuNo 147665, on a low-level mission, crashed into Pyramid Lake northeast of Reno, Nevada, in the late afternoon. The three crew members on board perished. It was the last of almost 100 Skywarriors that were lost in crashes, accounting for a staggering 42% of production. A-3s were also stricken in at least 20 other cases as a result of gear-up landings or in-flight mishaps. However, it was often mentioned, although somewhat sarcastically, in the “Whale” community that the aircraft’s lack of ejection seats was the reason it had survived for so long!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uT40pxuPzfo

A-3 Skywarrior Units of the Vietnam War is published by Osprey Publishing and is available to order here.

Photo and video: John Herndon / herndonjtexas

August 11, 2024 0 comment

The B-70 proposal aimed to carry 19 general-purpose missiles attached to various parts of the aircraft

by Till Daisd August 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

The XB-70A Valkyrie

The 1950s saw the conception of the futuristic XB-70A Valkyrie, a high-altitude, nuclear strike bomber capable of flying at Mach 3, or three times the speed of sound, beyond the reach of any prospective enemy.

However, by the beginning of the 1960s, high-speed, high-altitude bombers were facing a threat to their survivability from new Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs). Less costly, nuclear-armed ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles) were also entering service. As a consequence, the costly B-70 bomber program was terminated in 1961 before any Valkyries had been completed or flown.

Even so, the USAF bought two XB-70As to test large supersonic aircraft’s aerodynamics, propulsion, and other characteristics. The first XB-70A, on display here, flew in September 1964 and achieved Mach 3 flight in October 1965. The second Valkyrie first flew in July 1965, but in June 1966, it was destroyed following an accidental mid-air collision. The third Valkyrie was not completed.

Up until it was given to the US Air Force National Museum in 1969, the original XB-70A aircraft was flown and produced useful test data for the research program.

B-70 with `General Purpose Missile’

A North American plan for employing the B-70 as a carrier for a “General Purpose Missile” was one of the more absurd-looking proposals, according to Scott Lowther’s book US Supersonic Bomber Projects. Unfortunately, not much is known about the missile, its performance, weight, or warhead. There is just a single illustration that demonstrates how eighteen of the missiles could be carried at once by a B-70.

The General Purpose Missile had a design featuring a delta-winged configuration, along with a single ramjet engine housed in a separate nacelle and downward-drooping wingtips. It was designed as a standoff weapon, likely equipped with a small nuclear warhead. By calling it a ‘general purpose` missile, it may be that it was intended to not only strike ground targets but possibly serve an air-to-air role as well.

The diagram in this article shows where the missiles were supposed to be gathered across the great expanse of the B-70, suspended beneath the wings with pylons, attached to the tips of both the canards and the vertical stabilizers, perched atop and underneath the fuselage. The source sketch does not depict all of the necessary pylons, explaining why some of the missiles in this reconstruction are not attached to the aircraft.

Able to carry 19 GPMs

Another diagram presents an alternate design for the General Purpose Missile. This missile was similar in size with a similar-looking ramjet engine… But otherwise, the configuration was quite different, looking more like a catamaran boat with a jet engine than a normal sort of missile. This version of the GPM weighed 698lb, would fly from Mach 3 to Mach 4 at 70,000 to 90,000ft, and had a range of 975 nautical miles.

The B-70 would be able to carry 19 of this version of the GPM.

US Supersonic Bomber Projects is published by Mortons Books and is available to order here.

The crazy B-70 proposal aimed to carry 19 General Purpose Missiles attached to the tips of canards, of vertical stabilizers, suspended beneath the wings and perched atop and underneath the fuselage

Photo by NASA

August 11, 2024 0 comment

Why the F-4G Wild Weasel was at least 30 years ahead of its time in capability

by Till Daisd August 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

The F-4G Wild Weasel

The F-4E, the most advanced Phantom II version with an internal gun and a wide range of ground assault capabilities, served as the basis for the F-4G Wild Weasel V, also called the Advanced Wild Weasel. This upgrade included a cockpit update for the rear seat to handle the electronic battle environment, as well as the removal of the gun and replacement with the APR-38(t) Radar Homing and Warning Receiver (later improved to the APR-47). A total of 134 F-4G models were converted from F-4Es with the first one flying in 1975. Squadron service began in 1978.

F-4Gs were deployed to three active wings. One was stationed at George AFB, Victorville, California, as part of the Rapid Deployment Force; one wing was assigned to USAFE (US Air Forces in Europe) at Spangdahlem AB, Germany; and the other to PACAF (Pacific Air Forces) at Clark AB, Philippines. F-4Gs from George AFB, Clark AB, and Spangdahlem AB saw combat during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, successfully protecting strike packages from enemy air defenses.

The F-4G operated with other F-4Gs or as a hunter aircraft, directing fighter-bombers, such as the F-16, against SAM sites while carrying AGM-88A/B/C High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missiles (HARM). The F-4G carried a pilot and an Electronic Warfare Officer (EWO) to facilitate communication, navigate, and coordinate assaults on the SAM installations.

30 years ahead of its time in capability

“The F-4G Wild Weasel [that first flew in 1975 and was retired in 1996] was at least 30 years ahead of its time in capability,” Jim Howard, former F-4G, and EF-111A EWO, says on Quora.

“In fact, I don’t think there is a flying system today that can geolocate radars as well by itself. The modern technique is to use multiple platforms to locate radars and share this information via datalinks.

“It had ‘DC to Daylight’ frequency coverage, had 52 flat plate antennas that used digital interferometry to measure the angle of arrival of radar pulses within seconds. Knowing the angle of arrival, the APR-38/47 system could compute the range, bearing, and probable type of radar within seconds.

“The APR38/47 system monitored 360 degrees around the F-4G.

“This information was displayed to the electronic warfare officer on a plan position indicator scope (PPI). This display was essentially an ‘inverse radar’, displaying radar emitters the same way a radar displays airborne targets.

“The APR38/47 system computed attack envelopes for anti-radiation missiles and displayed this information to the crew.”

Howard continues;

The incredible story of the F-4G Wild Weasel that dodged 6 SAMs in few seconds During Operation Desert Storm

F-16s technically very inferior to the F-4G Wild Weasel

“When the F-4 platform became unsupportable the Weasel mission was passed off to F-16s using a cobbled-up pod system that primarily used the AGM-88 seeker head to detect threats.

“In all ways, the F-16 Weasels were technically very inferior to the F-4G, although the F-16 as a fighter outperforms Double Ugly by orders of magnitude.

“The F-4G Weasels were spectacularly successful in Desert Storm in suppressing Surface to Air missile sites.”

He concludes;

“Although not designed for air-to-air use, one F-4G did succeed in blowing most of the tail off an airborne bomber with an AGM-88 anti-radiation missile.

“OK, it was a friendly B-52, everyone got home, the BUFF crew all got medals, and the whole thing is forgotten now. By the Weasels anyway, maybe not so much by the BUFF guys.”

Photo by U.S. Air Force

August 11, 2024 0 comment

T-2-Ejection-seat

Naval Aviator explains discomfort of T-2 Buckeye ejection seat

by Till Daisd August 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

Which aircraft’s ejection seat is the most comfortable?

An ejection seat is a mechanism installed in an aircraft that is intended to save the pilot or other crew members in the event of an emergency. The majority of designs include the canopy coming off and the seat being propelled out of the aircraft by a rocket motor or explosive charge, carrying the pilot with it. The ejection seat releases a parachute once it is outside of the aircraft. To prevent a collision, the seats of two-seat aircraft are ejected at different angles.

Pilots had to manually remove the aircraft canopy to climb out before the invention of ejection seats. Lives can be saved with ejection seats. Which airplane, nevertheless, has the most comfortable ejector seat?

‘None of them are great. Some are terrible,’ David Tussey, a former US Navy A-7 Corsair II pilot, says on Quora.

The T-2C Buckeye had the worst ejection seat

‘The worst ejection seat I ever flew was in the T-2C “Buckeye” training aircraft, which I both trained in and was an instructor pilot in. I have about 1500 hrs in that puppy…err “guppy”.

‘The ejection seat [the Buckeye’s ejection seat was the North American LS-1] in the T-2C used an explosive device instead of a rocket to eject the seat. So, the instantaneous “G” force during an ejection occurred right at the start, instead of accelerating through the sequence as happens during a rocket-powered seat.

‘As a result, the seat could not accommodate a cushion as that would allow the seat to accelerate, even if it’s just a 1″ of vertical travel (by compressing the cushion), before the seat bottom impacts the body of the pilot. And that would likely cause injury.

‘So, no cushion, just a hard-plastic seat. As an IP, flying 2–3 times per day, riding that seat caused me a lot of back problems. And then there were the carrier landings and FCLPs. It was a bit rough.’

The T-2C Buckeye was a great basic jet trainer

Tussey concludes;

‘But I have to say, the T-2C was, in retrospective, a damn good basic jet trainer, highly maneuverable, forgiving, fully acrobatic, pretty fast, and carrier capable. What’s not to like?

‘No pain, no gain.’

US Naval Aviator explains why landing on an aircraft carrier for first time is one of the most incredible things you can experience, yet it’s also one of the most terrifying

Photo by U.S. Navy

August 11, 2024 0 comment

SR-71 Blackbird surprises F-4 crew with a vertical takeoff demonstration

by Till Daisd August 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

The SR-71

One of the most advanced Blackbirds, the SR-71 (along with the A-12 and YF-12), was designed by a team of Lockheed personnel under the direction of Clarence “Kelly” Johnson, who was vice president of Lockheed’s Advanced Development Company Projects at the time. Known as the “Skunk Works,” this unit is now called Lockheed Martin.

The Blackbirds were built to reach altitudes of up to 85,000 feet and cruise at Mach 3.2, which is little over three times the speed of sound or more than 2,200 miles per hour. The SR-71 strategic reconnaissance aircraft held the record for being the fastest and highest-flying operational aircraft in the world for about 24 years. It could survey 100,000 square miles of the Earth’s surface per hour from 80,000 feet.

Therefore, it should come as no surprise that the aircraft has broken multiple speed and altitude records during its history due to its incredible flight characteristics.

Once F-4 crews told the SR-71 couldn’t go vertical after takeoff. They gave up after a Blackbird did a high-performance takeoff (with sensitive equipment replaced with ballast).

Blackbird high performance takeoff

The following story is provided by an SR-71 Blackbird mechanic who wants to remain anonymous:

‘I won’t say who; I won’t say when, but I did see the SR go vertical ONCE, and that was at Kadena [Air Base]. The F-4 jocks used to tell us when they were going to do a high-performance takeoff during an FCF (Functional Check Flight) so we could watch a “real takeoff”!

‘Our DET Commander had chewed his lip long enough, and the stage was set. We finally had the kind of flight scheduled where the plan could be put into action.

‘All sensors were removed and replaced with ballast. That included the ballast nose. This didn’t lighten the aircraft, but removed sensitive equipment, gyros, and such. On the morning of the launch, the Fighter wing was notified. The SR did its thing getting ready to launch. Brakes released, burners on, and once it was up, it accelerated just above the runway. And then, IT HAPPENED. It went vertical in full afterburner. It was loud AND impressive! Needless to say, it shut the F-4 lads up for a while.

‘Written by somebody who knew.’

Check out Habubrats SR-71‘s Twitter profile, SR71Habubrats‘s Instagram profile, and Born into the Wilde Blue Yonder Habubrats‘s Facebook page for further Blackbird photos and stories.

Photo by Linda Sheffield Miller, Boeing and U.S. Navy

August 11, 2024 0 comment

When Grumman flew F-14A No. 3 with the starboard wing locked fully forward and the port wing swept fully aft

by Till Daisd August 11, 2024

written by Till Daisd

The F-14 Tomcat

When it came to Cold War fighters from the Free World, none could match the Grumman F-14 Tomcat of the US Navy. Six long-range AIM-54A Phoenix missiles could be guided by the F-14’s AWG-9 weapons control system against six different threat aircraft at a long distance. For medium-range combat, Sparrow missiles were carried; Sidewinders and a 20mm were available for dogfighting. In the latter role, the Tomcat’s variable-sweep wings gave the F-14 a combat maneuvering capability that could not have been achieved with a “standard” fixed planform wing.

The F-14A, which employed the P&W TF30 engines and AWG-9 system and carried the six Phoenix missiles designated for the F-111B, was created in 1968 to replace the controversial F-111B, which was being developed for the Navy’s carrier fighter inventory. A completely new fighter system was designed around these that placed a strong focus on standoff missile fighting and close-in fighting “claws.” After undergoing five years of development, evaluation, squadron training, and initial carrier deployments following its first flight on December 21, 1970, the F-14A has become the most potent fighter aircraft for carrier air wings. Technical and financial problems that received a great deal of publicity have been overcome in achieving this goal.

When Grumman flew F-14A No. 3 with the starboard wing locked fully forward and the port wing swept fully aft (Today this Tomcat is on display at the Cradle of Aviation Museum) — F-14A, Aircraft No. 3, BuNo. 157982 at the Cradle of Aviation Museum

F-14A No. 3

F-14A [Aircraft No. 3, Bureau Number (BuNo.) 157982], the third Tomcat manufactured and one of the prototypes utilized in the initial testing of the aircraft, can be seen on exhibit at the Cradle of Aviation Museum at Mitchel Field, Long Island. There are several reasons why this particular Tomcat is significant. Firstly, it is the oldest surviving F-14 in the world.

When Grumman flew F-14A No. 3 with the starboard wing locked fully forward and the port wing swept fully aft (Today this Tomcat is on display at the Cradle of Aviation Museum) — F-14A, Aircraft No. 3, BuNo. 157982 at the Cradle of Aviation Museum

No. 3 first flew on Dec. 28, 1971, with Grumman Test Pilots Don Evans (pilot) and Dennis Romano (Weapon Systems Officer). As told by David F. Brown in his book Tomcat Alley: A Photographic Roll Call of the Grumman F-14 Tomcat, she was then delivered on Jan. 4, 1972.

The second interesting thing about BuNo. 157982 is that while operating out of the Grumman Flight Test Facility at Calverton, New York, No 3 was primarily used for determining the entire structural envelope for the F-14 and investigating certain flight characteristics under extreme conditions.

When Grumman flew F-14A No. 3 with the starboard wing locked fully forward and the port wing swept fully aft (Today this Tomcat is on display at the Cradle of Aviation Museum)

One of these was in response to concerns raised by the US Navy regarding asymmetrical wing sweep. The asymmetrical wing sweep program came as a result of an incident in the fleet where the wings on one Tomcat in flight experienced a slight misalignment with the degree setting for each wing.

This resulted in concern by the Navy that if this problem persisted could the F-14 safely land as well as take off. No. 3 is best remembered for the photo shown above (The presence of a star and bar on both wings led some to believe that this was a cleverly faked piece of photographic trickery, but in fact, the photo really does show Tomcat 3 with her wings swept differentially, with the starboard wing locked fully forward, and the port wing swept fully aft).

Flight tests

When Grumman flew F-14A No. 3 with the starboard wing locked fully forward and the port wing swept fully aft (Today this Tomcat is on display at the Cradle of Aviation Museum) — F-14A, Aircraft No. 3, BuNo. 157982 at the Cradle of Aviation Museum

As explained by William Barto, F-14 NATOPS illustrator, Historian, and on the Board of Directors of the F-14 Tomcat Association and museum associate, Cradle of Aviation Museum, in an article for the F-14 Tomcat Association, a series of flight tests were conducted from December 19, 1985 to February 28, 1986. Chuck Sewell, the Chief Test Pilot of Grumman, carried out multiple trials wherein the left wing was positioned at 35, 50, 60, and 68 degrees of sweep while the right wing was locked in the forward position at 20 degrees. It was determined that the maximum landing angle was 60 degrees. Sewell found that the aircraft could be used for carrier landings in this configuration in the case of an operational in-flight malfunction.

The famous photo of an asymmetrical wing sweep with the right wing at 20 degrees and the left wing at 60, proved in an extreme way that the jet could still perform.

When Grumman flew F-14A No. 3 with the starboard wing locked fully forward and the port wing swept fully aft (Today this Tomcat is on display at the Cradle of Aviation Museum)

Tomcat No. 3 flew for the last time in 1990, and she was stricken on Sep. 20, 1994. Acquired by the Cradle of Aviation Museum in 1995, No. 3 is shown here on display in Hangar 2. It is also interesting to note that Tom Gwynne, Vice President for External Relations for the “Cradle”, and Grumman Test Pilot No. 72, flew No. 3 on several occasions.

Photo by Grumman and William Barto

August 11, 2024 0 comment

Seraphinite Accelerator

Optimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.